GLOBAL ECONOMICS AND POLITICS
Leo Haviland provides clients with original, provocative, cutting-edge fundamental supply/demand and technical research on major financial marketplaces and trends. He also offers independent consulting and risk management advice.
Haviland’s expertise is macro. He focuses on the intertwining of equity, debt, currency, and commodity arenas, including the political players, regulatory approaches, social factors, and rhetoric that affect them. In a changing and dynamic global economy, Haviland’s mission remains constant – to give timely, value-added marketplace insights and foresights.
Leo Haviland has three decades of experience in the Wall Street trading environment. He has worked for Goldman Sachs, Sempra Energy Trading, and other institutions. In his research and sales career in stock, interest rate, foreign exchange, and commodity battlefields, he has dealt with numerous and diverse financial institutions and individuals. Haviland is a graduate of the University of Chicago (Phi Beta Kappa) and the Cornell Law School.
Subscribe to Leo Haviland’s BLOG to receive updates and new marketplace essays.
In various forms and fashions, accounting greatly matters in cultural domains. Economic realms employ professional accountants and other measurers and judges of accuracy (and compliance, responsibility, and virtue), but money meadows are not the only field involving accountability. In financial playgrounds- as in politics, war, romance, and elsewhere- it’s important to carefully evaluate the truth, quality, and implications of accounts and other storytelling.
Despite the ongoing excitement of the European sovereign debt crisis, European banks are not the only ones facing significant challenges. Thus some gloomy bystanders perhaps want to avoid renewed scans of America’s banks in the context of real estate and derivatives.
Sometimes the titanic numbers of billions and trillions mask the crucial importance of what’s going on in the provinces of smaller quantities. US real median household income in 2010 was about $49,400, a 2.3pc slide from 2009. Since 2007, real income has tumbled 6.4pc. It is 7.1pc under the median household income peak in 1999, back to the 1996 level of $49.1m.
According to the US Treasury’s recent TIC statistics (9/16/11), major foreign holders (official and others) of Treasury securities (these include bills, notes, and bonds) held about $4.48 trillion of them in July 2011. This is down slightly from June 2011’s $4.50tr and May’s $4.51tr. They held $4.45tr in January 2011. In sum, they’ve essentially not been net buyers for several months. Even relative to July 2010, they’ve been mediocre net buyers. Foreigners held $4.13tr in July 2010; July 2011 thus represents a meager add-on of only about $353 billion to the year-ago month.
Though money supply data are only one variable relevant to inflation, they have started to hint that the future inflationary picture will be less pretty than ardent Fed professors proclaim. Even in a sluggish or recessionary economy, and even if some deflationary forces at home or overseas are strong, that does not prove that inflation will not increase. And inflation perhaps will float considerably higher than many predict.
FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this market essay as a PDF file.
Show Me the Money! (9-19-11)
The level and trend of the Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index alongside this nosedive in the S+P 500 indicates that the US economy and the S+P 500 probably will slump further over the next several months. If so, then the worldwide economy will slow alongside America’s, as will many other equity arenas. Given the close links between the S+P 500 and overall commodity marketplace trends in recent years, commodity players should monitor the Consumer Confidence Index.
After the first quarter of 2009, both the S+P 500 and the Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index (“CCI”) rose sharply. The S+P 500’s race to its 5/2/11 peak at 1371 more than doubled its 3/6/09 low at 667. At this 5/2/11 altitude, it was about 87 percent of its 10/11/07 major high, and just 4.8pc beneath its final pre-crisis top at 1440 on 5/19/08.
The CCI’s February 2011 high at 72.0 indeed represents a steep ascent from its February 2009 25.3 valley. Yet it nevertheless fell well short of the 111.9 July 2007 top. Moreover, this winter 2011 CCI elevation was only modestly above the 61.4 level of March 2003- when the S+P 500 achieved a major low at 789 (3/12/03) miles underneath 2011’s various S+P 500 heights. In addition, since February 2011- when the S+P 500 made an initial top at 1344 on 2/18/11, the CCI has ebbed lower. It fell under 60 in June (57.6) and July (59.2) and tumbled to 44.5 in August.
However, given the sharp fall in the S+P 500 from its February, May, and July 2011 highs (8/9/11 low at 1101 is almost a twenty percent drop from 1371; 9/2/11 close about 1173), the S+P 500 and CCI now are confirming each other in a bearish path.
Note the S+P 500 plateau on 3/24/00 at 1553 was not far from the October 2007 summit (Dow Jones Industrial Average high 1/14/00 around 11,910). In contrast, the February 2011 Confidence Index level lurks far beneath (only 50 percent of) the 144.7 achieved in January 2000. This underscores the current weakness of consumer net worth and the related mournful consumer attitude.
FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this market essay as a PDF file.
Consumer Confidence and US Stocks (9-6-11)
Yet despite these economic rescue and repair programs, the continued substantial overall weakness in the US real estate marketplace reflects and warns of trouble. In particular, what do the housing sector and its consequences for the consumer balance sheet suggest? One should view real estate in the context of consumer confidence. The foundation for and structure of the recovery fabricated by the homespun policies of the Fed and the political herd is fragile. Although progress has been made, the shattering damage of the international economic disaster that commenced in 2007 has not been fixed. Though the worldwide economic recovery that emerged in spring 2009 is not entirely a house of cards, it’s also not entirely built on solid ground.
Nominal GDP growth is better than none at all, right? All else equal, money printing does not over time breed permanent real GDP growth. Also, deficit spending borrows from the future to spend in the present; it may boost current output, but at the end of the day, this factor primarily involves a shift of money between players and across time. All else equal, even if a slump in the broad real US trade weighted dollar benefits the US economy, that tends to undermine those of many of its trading partners. Holding policy interest rates such as Fed Funds low does not preclude higher yields later. Don’t those substantially in debt or suffering injury to their net worth often endorse easy money policies? Despite optimism indicated by rosy prices in the S+P 500 and lofty corporate profits, US real economic growth probably will be mediocre looking forward from now. What happens to American real estate still matters a great deal for the global economy.
Given the still-weak home and commercial real estate marketplaces, the net worth of many banking institutions probably is vulnerable to marking-to-market of existing real estate loan portfolios. Renewed economic weakness of course would worsen that problem. In any event, banks nervous about their capital strength will not hurry to significantly expand their overall lending.
FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW to download this market essay as a PDF file.
American Real Estate (The Money Jungle, Part Two)
View Leo Haviland’s profile